Due to non-constitution of GSTAT petitioner is deprived of his statutory remedy U/s. 112 of GST Act, so HC granted stay against recovery
Issue the respective Master Circulars consolidating all guidelines issued and applicable as on March 31 of every year, segregated subject-wise.
The issue on merit that whether the service of construction of complex provided by the appellant’s cooperative housing society to its members is eligible to service tax or otherwise has been settled in favour of the appellant. It was informed by the learned counsel that the Hon’ble High Court’s judgment (supra) has been accepted by the revenue.
When faced with a financial crisis, borrowing funds is a measure that many across the country rely on. So much so, that today there are many financial institutions that offer credit in different forms at an affordable cost.
Aroshi Jain Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Circular No.03/2017 dated 21.02.2017 provides that no further clarification or verification is required to be made in a case of an individual when the deposited amount during demonetization period is upto Rs. 2,50,000/-. In the present case, the assessee who is a housewife having no other source of income […]
Sharad Kumar Garg Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) It is seen from the record that the lower authorities have been disputing the factum of Will. It is also undisputed fact that in the Will there is no specific mention relating to weight and description of such jewellery which was being bequeathed by the testator. However, it […]
Shreedhra Agro LLP Vs Commissioner of Customs (Delhi High Court) 1. The appellant has filed the present appeal impugning an order dated 22.06.2022 passed by the Customs Authority for Advance Rulings, New Delhi (hereafter ‘CAAR’) whereby the products proposed to be imported by the appellant being ‘Scented & Flavoured and Sweetened Supari’ are classified under […]
Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) It is evident from the same that the ITAT held that the claim of expenditure incurred by the assessee on the abandoned project, amounting to Rs.20.50 lakhs, was allowable to it subject to the assessee demonstrating the fact that it had incurred the expenditure itself, […]
B T Patel & Co Vs C.C.E. & S.T.-Rajkot (CESTAT Ahmedabad) CESTAT find that the learned Commissioner in denying the exemption by made a strict interpretation of language of the notification no. 4/2004-ST dated 31.03.2004 though as per the language of the exemption of service provided to SEZ developer or to the unit in SEZ. […]
Assessing Officer cannot accept the income for tax purpose and refuse to allow credit of corresponding TDS. Both must go hand in hand.
