PCIT Vs Balmer Lawrie and Company Limited (Calcutta High Court) The tribunal after taking note of the factual position noted that the CIT(A) has taken specific note of the fact that the expenses claimed by the assessee as prior period, the liability to pay had crystallized during the relevant previous year and therefore the claim […]
Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Ultra Tech Cement Limited (CESTAT Kolkata) Respondent submits that when the demand itself is not sustainable, the question of imposing penalty does not arise. He further submits that the impugned order has erroneously invoked the extended period of limitation under Section 11A(1) of the Act on the ground of willful […]
CBIC amends Notification Notification No. 11/2022-Customs, dated 1st February, 2022 and Notification No. 12/2022-Customs, dated 1st February, 2022 vide Notification No. 33/2023-Customs Dated: 27th April, 2023. MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) Notification No. 33/2023-Customs | Dated: 27th April, 2023 G.S.R. 319(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 25 of the […]
Impugned order was passed by CIT(A) in absence of assessee. Assessee did not get an opportunity to represent his case before CIT(A)
GST: Petitioner urged that had goods been perishable it ought to have sold in terms of rules 141(2) within 15 days of seizure and as it has not been sold, goods ought to be treated as non-perishable.
Since the question of whether the transactions in issue constitute works contracts or sales would involve an examination of the contracts as well as various other factual particulars and such an exercise cannot be undertaken in writ jurisdiction.
Condition of repatriating any funds lying idle in account for a period up to 15 days from the date of its receipt is withdrawn with immediate effect, which shall now be governed by the provisions of the scheme as contained in the aforesaid Master Direction on LRS.
It is further observed and held that when the State is inclined to give some tax benefit to tax prayers, terms or provisions of the policy should be interpreted in a liberal manner and with an intention to see that the purpose for which the policy is framed is fulfilled and the beneficiaries is helped.
Ishwarbhai Madhavlal Patel-HUF Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) In the present case, the Karta of HUF having expired in the year 2021 itself when this information was first provided and since then revised Form No. 36 in the name of the legal-heirs or representative of the deceased-assessee is not be filed as provided in Rule 26 […]
ITAT held that once additions been made under Black Money Act the same addition cannot be made under Income Tax Act on the same set of facts
