As a measure to broaden access of non–resident investors to debt instruments in India, Foreign Portfolio Investors (FPI) are now permitted to invest in municipal bonds.. FPI investment in municipal bonds shall be reckoned within the limits set for FPI investment in State Development Loans (SDLs).
It is apparent that the Respondent did not increase the per unit base price (excluding GST) of the product, which was Rs. 1028.07 in the pre-GST era. Further, it was reduced to Rs. 1021.73 in the post-GST era w.e.f 01.07.2017 and it also remained at Rs. 1021.73 when the GST rate was reduced from 28% to 18% w.e.f 15.11.2017 and hence, there was no increase in the per unit base price. Therefore, the allegation of profiteering is not sustainable in terms of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017. As such, we do not find any merit in the application filed by the above Applicants and the same is therefore dismissed.
Office of the Commissioner of Sales Tax, (GST), 8th floor, GST Bhavan, Mazgaon, Mumbai-400010. TRADE CIRCULAR No: ACST (VAT)-3/Led. Confirmation/SAP/2018-19/B- 535 Mumbai, Dt 25/04/19 Trade Circular No. 15T of 2019 Subject : Submission of details of sales through Online Ledger Confirmation Utility.. Reference : Trade Circular No. 30T of 2018 dated 24/10/2018 Your attention is invited towards […]
Power of review is not an inherent power but must be conferred by law either specifically or by necessary implication. Courts have consistently held that review proceedings imply those proceedings where a party, as of right, can apply for reconsideration of the matter already decided upon after a fresh hearing on the merits of the controversy between the parties and that such a remedy is available only if provided by the statute.
Where the loans were taken by assessee in cash from his relatives, the transactions between relatives were not in the nature of loans or deposits as envisaged in section 269SS and the penalty imposed under section 271D was accordingly cancelled.
ITAT held that the business receipts of the foreign residents are not taxable in India since the agents have no PE in India and therefore, the assessee was not required to make TDS u/s 195 of the Act. Therefore, the assessee’s appeals for all the three A.Ys are allowed.
This question pertains to formulae for calculation of refund and hence does not fall within the purview of Section 97 of the CGST Act and is therefore not answered.
In re JSL India Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Haryana) Q1. What would be the rate of tax applicable on inter-state supply of parts of railways in unassembled condition? Ans: From the explanatory note VII mentioned above, it is clear that complete or finished articles presented unassembled or disassembled are to be classified in the same […]
In re Sanofi India Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) Whether input tax credit is available of the GST paid on expenses incurred towards promotional schemes of Shubh Labh Loyalty Program? if we accept the contention of the applicant that the promotional items are supplied as a contractual obligation e.g. watch is given under the contractual obligation […]
In re Vijai Electricals Limited (GST AAAR Andhra Pradesh) Ruling of AAR is upheld. Confirmed that the work contracts service rendered by M/s Vijai Electricals (the appellant) to APEPDCL are not eligible for concessional rate of tax 12% as per serial no.3 of entry no.vi (a) of notification no. 24/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 21-09-2017. […]
