Appointment of Common Adjudicating Authority by Pr. DGRI vide Notification No. 24/2019-Customs (N.T./CAA/DRI) dated 27th June, 2019.
M/s. Kumar’s Electronics Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai) Once the service tax has been paid on the M.R.P no service tax needs to be paid on the commission received by the distributor because it is a part of the M.R.P. If tax is so levied, it amounts to double taxation. This view held […]
Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court) The Petitioner’s grievance is that the Respondents are not issuing Form C in respect of its purchase of natural gas from Gujrat. This is used in the manufacture of polyester staple fibre. Primarily, the contention of the Petitioner is that the same […]
Mr. Mohammad Azid Ramzani Vs M/s Adarsh Marbles (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) It is revealed that the Central Govt. vide Notification No.41/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 14.11.2017 had reduced the rate of GST from 28% to 18% in respect of the tiles with effect from 15.11.2017. the benefit of which was required to be passed on to […]
Sri Krishna Traders Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) The writ-applicant is operating from the State of Tamil Nadu. It appears that the consignment of betel nuts was being transported from Vellor, State of Tamil Nadu, to Delhi. While the goods were in transit and passing through the State of Gujarat, the vehicle was […]
When an HUF’s residential house is sold, the capital gain should be invested for the purchase of only one residential house is an incorrect proposition. After all, the HUF property is held by the members as joint tenants. The members keeping in view the future needs in event of separation, purchase more than one residential building, it cannot be said that the benefit of exemption is to be denied under s. 54(1) of the IT Act.
Sh. Saurabh Gahoi Vs M/s Pinky Sales (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) The Respondent had submitted that he was running an exclusive showroom of M/s Liberty Shoe Ltd.. which had given him the software which was being used for billing and he could not make any modification to this software since it was fully controlled by M/s […]
In re M/s. Chennai Port Trust (GST AAR Tamilnadu) The amounts received on or after 01.07.2017 towards interest, late fee penalty relating to the services of lease/rent, due to delayed payment of consideration for those services rendered by the applicant before 01.07.2017, are liable to GST. FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, […]
Pr. CIT Vs M/s. JWC Logistics Park Pvt Ltd (Bombay High Court) HC dismissed the Revenue’s Appeal before it by holding that the Container Freight Station (CFS) run by the respondent – assessee is eligible for deduction under Section 80IA of the Act as an infrastructure facility. FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER / […]
Former Superintendent of Central Excise & Customs Sentenced In A DA Case The Designated Court, CBI Cases, Ernakulam (Kerala) has convicted Shri T. Gopalakrishnan, former Superintendent of Central Excise & Customs, Cochin U/s 13(2) r/w 13(1)(e) of PC Act and sentenced him to undergo two years Simple Imprisonment with fine of Rs. 26,50,000/- in a […]
