G. V. Infosutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (Delhi High Court) The rejection of the petitioner’s application under Section 119(2)(b) is only on the ground that according to the Chief Commissioner’s opinion the plea of omission by the auditor was not substantiated. This court has difficulty to understand what more plea or proof any assessee could […]
Pr. CIT Vs M/s. Lee & Murihead Pvt Ltd (Bombay High Court) Sub-section (2) of section 14A of Income Tax Act, 1961 provides that Assessing Officer would determine the amount of expenditure incurred in relation to income which not forms part of total income if he is not satisfied with the correctness of claim of […]
EBR Enterprises Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court) Sub Section (5) of Section 80A of the Act mandates is that, if the assessee fails to make a claim in his return of income for any deduction under the provisions specified therein, the same would not be granted to the assessee. This condition or restriction […]
We also find that CIDCO has awarded the construction contract of the project of “Development of Infrastructure facility for Passenger Water Transport Terminal at Nerul, Navi Mumbai to ‘Ajwani-Kargwal Joint Venture’, and not to the applicant. Thus the applicant is not a person competent to apply for ruling as provided under Section 95 of the GST Act.
SEBI Circular on Non-compliance with certain provisions of SEBI (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2018 (ICDR Regulations)
Principal Sri Sathya Sai College for Women Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) Assessee college has issued appointment letters to teachers/ lecturers/ staff members from time to time to whom salary was paid. The monthwise salary sheet was also prepared by the college on the basis of the attendance register of the employees. The salary was paid […]
Provision of section 45(3) are exhaustive and does not confer any power on the AO to adopt consideration different from what is recorded in the books of account of the firm. Thus, AO was not correct in adopting the market value of land as revalued subsequently by the firm in the books of account.
In re Siemens Ltd (GST AAR West Bangal) Whether mobilization advance for works contract is supply on the date on which it stands credited on the supplier’s account? After the GST comes into force, the works contract is no longer divisible into a contract for the supply of goods and a service contract. It is […]
In re Novel Engineering & Technical Works Private Limited (GST AAR West Bangal) Whether evacuation and disposal of ash from ash pond of a thermal power station is an exempted supply? Scrutiny of the work as described in para 2.2 reveals that the work involves earthwork, excavation, sloping and earthmoving services involving making of embankments […]
DCIT Vs Prathamik Shikshak Sahakari Bank Ltd. (ITAT Pune) Brief facts relating to the issue are that the Assessing Officer was of the view that in the absence of any scheme formulated by the assessee bank, the amount paid as ex-gratia to prematurely retiring employees was not to be allowed as deduction. The case of […]
