ITO Vs Mayuri Constructions (ITAT Hyderabad) The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a firm engaged in the business as civil contractor filed its return of income for the AY 2008-09 on 14/10/2008 declaring total income of Rs. 65,254/-. Initially, the return was processed U/s. 143(1) of the Act and thereafter […]
More Credit Securities (P) Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) We find the Ld. CIT(A) while deleting the addition made by the A.O. under section 68 of the I.T. Act, 1961 has noted that assessee has filed the copies of the returns of income for A.Y. 2010-11 of all the applicants, copies of their audited balance-sheets […]
G. Victor Devasahayam Vs ACIT (Madras High Court) It is not disputed that sanction under Section 279 (1) of Income Tax Act is already been granted and sanctioned for the offence under Section 276(C)(1) and other offences. Since the expression unless the sanction had been already obtained for a prosecution on the same facts as […]
Commissioner of Customs (Export) Vs Reliance Industries Limited (Bombay High Court) The proper officer, to whom power is conferred by Section 28 of the said Act and other related provisions would necessarily mean the proper officer, who in the first instance, assessed and cleared the goods, i.e., Apprising Officer of Air Cargo Complex. Therefore, the […]
Ram Prasad Ganga Prasad Vs Assistant Commissioner (Calcutta High Court) In this writ petition, petitioners have challenged the impugned order of adjudication dated 1st November, 2021 passed by the GST Authority concerned as appears at page 47 to the writ petition. Main ground of challenge of the impugned adjudication order by the petitioners is that […]
If the petitioner had played the role of a WhatsApp group administrator alone and nothing else, then while filing final report, the petitioner’s name shall be deleted. If some other material is also gathered by the first respondent so as to implicate the petitioner, then of course the petitioner will have to challenge the case only on merits.
Vide Notification No. 142/2021-Income Tax | Dated: 31st December, 2021 CBDT notifies Tax Exemption to Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), set up by the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986, in respect of the specified income under section 10(46) of Income Tax Act, 1961. MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES) […]
Brillio Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Vs Registrar of Companies (NCLAT Delhi) NCLAT that the NCLT has erroneously held that the Application for reduction of share is not maintainable under Section 66 of the Act, consent affidavits from the creditors is mandatory for reduction of share capital, SPA cannot be utilized for making payment to non-promoter shareholders, […]
The last date of submitting applications under MEIS, SEIS, ROSCTL, ROSL and 2% additional ad hoc incentive (under para 3.25 of FTP) which was earlier notified to be 31.12.2021 has been extended till 31.01.2022.
HC held that Cenvat Credit not eligible on facility of transportation provided by the appellant to its employees as same was merely in the nature of service for personal use or consumption of its employees.
