Appellant’s shop in SHA cannot by any stretch of imagination be said to be located outside India. Instead, we find that the appellant’s shop is located within India, as defined under s2(56) of the CGST Act, 2017 read with s2 (27) of the Customs Act, 1962.
GSA Gestions Sportives Automobiles SA Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi bench has held that penalty can’t be invoked under Income Tax Act without relevant documents which substantiate business activities. The appellant GSA (Gestions Sportives Automobiles) is a company engaged in providing services of qualified motor racing drivers to teams […]
Polybond India Pvt. Ltd. Vs JCIT (ITAT Pune) It is seen that the assessee claimed deduction u/s 10B of the Act. In the computation of deduction, the assessee inter alia, excluded DEPB entitlement of Rs.48.28 lakhs from the `export turnover‟ which amount was also excluded from the amount of `total turnover’. The authorities below have […]
The frequency of the following returns is modified as under: i. HIR-19 return to be submitted annually instead of quarterly ii. HIR-14 to HIR – 17 returns to be submitted annually instead of Half-yearly c. GHIS return (HIR-20) on Information on Government Sponsored Health Insurance Schemes and GHISAR Return (HIR-21) stands dispensed with.
Import of Oxytocin shall remain Prohibited. However, import of Oxytocin reference standards falling under HS Codes 29371900, 29372900, 29379019, 29379090 and all HS Codes at 8 digit level under 3004 is permitted exclusively for the purpose of test and analysis subject to submission of Test License issued by the DGCI / CDCSO.
In a move to further facilitate trade from our eastern borders, it has been decided that empty containers returning from Bangladesh via the rail route, may be utilized to carry export goods of Bangladesh to India through the Petrapole-Benapole and the Gede-Darshana Land Customs Stations.
A timeline Of 90 days from the insolvency commencement date is available for filing of claims. However, it has been observed that there is an inordinate delay in filing of claims by Customs and GST authorities. T
ITO Vs Sanika Avadhoot Shilotri (ITAT Mumbai) When the developer failed to provide original flat then it had offered another flat in the building which was to be constructed on a future date. When the assessee has booked the flat that property was not in existing and it was a property to be constructed in […]
Vijay Baid @ Vicky Vs Union of India (Chhattisgarh High Court) Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that pursuant to arrest made by Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) on 01.05.2021 of two persons at Railway Station- Raipur, DRI further searched the house of petitioner on the same date and have seized gold bar, silver […]
Hivelm Industries Vs Commissioner of G.S.T. and Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai) It is not in dispute that the deemed export did not attract any Excise Duty and hence, it is not the duty of the appellant / taxpayer to repeatedly plead before the authorities that the project in which it was involved was a deemed […]
