Infosys Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) The relevant ground with regard to the above issue are grounds 9.1 to 9.3. The Special Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Nagarjuna Fertilizders and Chemicals Ltd. v. ACIT reported in (2017) 78 taxmann.com 264 had held if rate of tax applicable under DTAA is lower than […]
Chinna Ponnu Ammal Trust Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai) After perusal of Form No.10B as placed on record, it could be seen that the assessee has applied an amount of Rs.5,55,57,015/- for the purpose of charitable trust. However, as per Explanation-3 to Sec.11(1), the disallowance of Rs.48,69,504/- u/s 40(a)(ia) would not be considered as application of […]
Sri Suhas Suresh Shet Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) In the matter of condonation of delay in filing appeals beyond the limitation period, the courts are empowered to condone the delay, provided the litigant is able to demonstrate that there was ‘sufficient cause’ in preferring appeal beyond the limitation period. The Courts have also held that […]
Since the major part of the work order, i.e., about 91%, is ‘Earth Work, the said work order of JV qualifies for the benefit of exemption under Sr. No. 3A of the Notification No. 12/2017-CTR dt. 08.06.2017, as amended by Notification No. 2/2018-CTR dt 25.01.2018, i.e. GST rate is NIL as Sr. no. 3 of Eleventh Schedule of Article 243G of the Constitution
As per stages of completion of work, Ai raising invoice to GMIDC, Aurangabad and on the same basis, as a JV member, applicant is raising invoice to N. Applicant, as a Ai member has got work order consisting of Earth Work such as Excavation for Tunnel, removing of excavated stuff, providing steel support, rock bolting, reinforcement, fixing of chain link, cement concerting etc. wherein total earth work is approximately 91%, construction work being around 9% wherein transfer of property is involved.
The Circular provided a mechanism of compensation to investors for delay in unblocking of application amounts by SCSBs and has prescribed certain compliance and reporting standards to be adopted by SCSBs.
Refund under section 77 of the UPSGST Act / section: 19 of the IGST Act would not be available where the taxpayer has made tax adjustment through issuance of Credit note under section 34 of the UPSGST Act in respect of the said transaction’
Income Tax Department Government of India Central Board of Direct Taxes, e-Filing Project ITR 4 – Validation Rules for AY 2022-23 Version 1.0 19th April 2022 Directorate of Income Tax (Systems) E-2, A.R.A. Centre, Ground Floor Jhandewalan Extension New Delhi – 110055 Document Revision List Document Name: ITR 4 – Validation Rules for AY 2022-23 […]
Tahura Enterprise Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) HC take notice of the fact that the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs extended the time limit for filing application for revocation of cancellation of registration and the limitation for all the orders passed on or before 12.06.2020 was to effectively commence from 31.08.2020. […]
Vide Notification No. 32/2022-Income Tax, Dated: 19.04.2022 CBDT designates Court in the State of Uttar Pradesh as the Special Court for the purposes of section 280A(1) of Income-tax Act, 1961 and section 84 of Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015. MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (CENTRAL BOARD […]
