In re New Grand Auto Body Works (GST AAR Kerala) The applicant is providing services of body building of commercial vehicles used for carrying goods on the chassis supplied by the customers. The body is built as per the requirement of the customers. The main issue to be determined is whether the activity constitutes supply […]
In re Sri. Puthusserikudy Thankappan Santhosh, M/s. Oyester Auto Body (GST AAR Kerala) Question 1. Whether the activity of commercial vehicles body building on job work basis, on the chassis supplied by the customer, is supply of goods or supply of services? Ruling: The activity of commercial vehicle body building on the chassis supplied by […]
whether the CIT(A) justified in confirming the addition of Rs.1,26,80,413/- on account of long term capital gain in the hands of the assessee instead of Jayantilal Oswal in the facts and circumstances of the case.
Explore the ITAT Ahmedabad ruling in Sangitaben Doshi vs. ITO case. The order discusses the disallowance of LTCG on Kappac Pharma shares based on conjectures.
Jagdishbhai R. Patel Vs ACIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) CIT(A) upheld the penalty of Rs.19,50,000/-,levied u/s 271AAB of the Act @ 30% of the undisclosed income of Rs.65 lacs, noting that the assessee had failed to fulfill the following conditions by the specified date as required by the section : a) filing its return declaring the undisclosed […]
Priti Nanda Vs CIT Appeals (Delhi High Court) 1. By way of the present petition, the Petitioner seeks a direction to the Respondents to list, hear and decide the first appeal filed by the Petitioner against the Assessment Order and freezing proceeding issued against her by the concerned Assessing Officer within a period of one […]
PAN of assessee should be cancelled by Income Tax department and credit for advance tax and TDS should be granted to assessee as per law.
Assessee found to be negligent, casual & noncompliant. So ITAT, refuse to condone inordinate delay of 789 days in filing appeal
If expenses are incurred for business, the same should be allowable as deduction and it is not necessary that expenditure may result in income or there must be substantial income.
Mahesh K. Bhutiya Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot) We have noted that the Revenue has accepted the income returned by the assessee from his business by applying 5% profit rate to his turnover of Rs. 20,85,825/-. It is evident therefore that it is an accepted fact that the assessee is a very small businessman and it […]
