Ravindra K Reshamwala Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held in favour of assessee with a reason that on the date of giving donation, the registration of the institute was valid u/s 35(1)(ii) granting approval. So deduction for donation can not be disallowed. FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT MUMBAI This appeal filed by […]
Petitioner challenged SCN based on GST audit report contending that certain observations made in audit report to which petitioner is not liable to pay
Since the E-way bill had expired an order of detention in Form GST MOV-06 and a notice in Form GST MOV-07 were issued wherein the petitioner company was directed to show cause as to why the proposed tax and penalty to the tune of Rs. 19,61,100/- be not imposed.
In the past 2-3 years, there has been a mushrooming of web based platforms offering fractional ownership of real estate assets. These platforms provide investors an option to invest in buildings and office spaces including warehouses, shopping centres, conference centres, etc. The minimum investment on these Fractional Ownership Platforms (FOPs) range from INR. 10 lakhs to INR. 25 lakhs.
Madras High Court considers withdrawal of customs duty exemption for Apollo Hospitals’ imported medical equipment. Analysis of compliance with Notification No.64/88.
M.A. Projects Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) ITAT note that the notice is an omnibus notice without specifying the specific charge upon the assessee and in such circumstances, Higher Courts have held that penalty levied is not sustainable. In this regard, we refer to Hon’ble Bombay High Court (Full Bench at Goa) in the […]
Jute Cess will be payable only when the goods are removed from the factory and hence the demands made in all three Orders are not sustainable.
State Bank of India Vs PCIT-2 (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT note that the AO during the assessment proceedings had requested the assessee to furnish explanation in respect of such items of expenses and receipt appearing in the trading accounts and profit and loss accounts (either by way of excess or reduction) in comparison to last year. […]
SC held that once NCLT is satisfied that default occurred, no discretion left with NCLT to refuse admission of Section 7 CIRP application
Kapil Kumar Agarwal Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) ITAT held that assessee has purchased a house property i.e. a new asset and is entitled to exemption u/s 54F of the act despite the fact that construction activities of the purchase of the new house has started before the date of sale of the original asset which […]
