In exercise of the powers conferred under Paragraph 1.03 of the Foreign Trade Policy, 2015-2020, the Director General of Foreign Trade hereby notifies the amendment in item No. 1 of the SION E 8, in the Handbook of Procedure Vol.11 as under:
In any indirect tax classification of goods is very important and has very wide implications particularly in case of multi rate tax structure like GST As we are aware that classification of goods under CGST Act, IGST Act and respective SGST Acts have to be done in accordance with Harmonized System of Nomenclature (HSN).
Relevant part of MAT-Ind AS Committee Report dated 17th June, 2017 containing recommendations regarding amendment to the provisions of the section 115JB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in respect of Ind AS Compliant Companies.
The Court is not prepared to accept the plea of the Revenue that merely because a panchnama was drawn up on 15thMay, 2007 showing that the search was ‘finally concluded’ on that date, it postponed the period of limitation in terms of Section 153B (2) (a) of the Act.
In view of the undisputed fact that a sum of Rs. 18,63,61,346/- was offered to tax though it was originally debited to the profit and loss account during the AY 2011-12,and because of the cost reimbursement agreement between the assessee and the parent entity on 18.05.2012 pursuant to which a sum of Rs. 13,21,53,000/- and Rs. 5,44,13,490/- was credited to the profit and loss account
Consequent upon the reorganization of the field formations on introduction of GST w.e.f 1.07.2017, the GST Commissionerates are to be allocated new DDO codes by the Chief Controller of Accounts (CBEC).
When registration under GST is required to be taken by Jewelers? A. i) Once the aggregate turnover crosses Rs.20 lakh a person becomes liable for registration. Time limit – Within 30 days from the day limit for aggregate turnover is crossed.
The article primarily deals with the procurements made by the SEZ units from the DTA suppliers and the tax ability thereon. It contains a summarized procedure for availing supplies at zero rate of tax by the SEZ units and also discusses the refund mechanisms available in the hands of the supplier.
This Tax Appeal is filed challenging the judgement of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 28.08.2006. The Tax Appeal has been taken up for consideration of following substantial questions of law: [A] “Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in confirming the order passed by the CIT(A) deleting the addition of […]
In the instant case the impugned property was sold at a value lesser than the value adopted for the purpose of stamp duty. Therefore the valuation determined for the purpose of stamp valuation is taken as sale consideration. However, such deeming provision cannot be applied to the provision of law as specified Section 54EC of […]
