The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam, recently ruled that advances given to the directors of a Company for purchase of land cannot be treated as deemed dividend Under section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 since the land is transferred to the company within time.
Jaycees Public School Vs. ITO (ITAT Delhi) We do not find that assessee is not engaged in the educational activities as merely charging of the fees does not make it existing for the purposes of the profit.
It is informed that only the health certificate issued on-line by the State Veterinary Authorities will be accepted for allowing export of meat and meat products and that Health Certificate issued manually shall not be accepted. The QR Code may be verified for the authenticity of the documents.
Detailed investigations carried out by the assessing officer establish the position that the contributors to share capital were persons of insignificant means and their credit worthiness to have made the contributions has not been established.
Kindly refer to this office letters F No DIT(R)/BIFR/2017-18/813 dated 03-10-2017 and F.No. DIT(R)/BIFR/2017-18/895 dated 17-10-2017 on the captioned matter.
Since then a large number of paper ITRs have been digitized by the field. Some of these returns have resulted in refunds. It may be noted that except in few cases (super-senior citizens) all refund returns have to be electronically filed.
The functionality for processing of ITR e-filed returns transferred by CPC- ITR to ITBA for AY 2016-17 is available w.e.f. 31.10.2017 in Income Tax Business Application (ITBA).
ASSOCHAM has suggested examining the impact of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) on exports and impressing upon the GST Council and the government to help exporters receive their tax refunds without any further delay, besides easing rules for the GST administration on exports to maintain the growth momentum.
Ahmedabad bench of the ITAT observed that the activities of the Gujarat Environment Service Society are charitable in nature. The main issue before the Tribunal was that whether the assesse is entitled for benefit of section 11(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 or not. Section 11(1)(a) is about exemptions related to charity.
CIT Vs. Ms Flytxt Technology P. Ltd. (Kerala High Court) Admittedly, the assessee initially claimed the benefit of Section 10B which was allowed by the Assessing Officer. Only when the Commissioner was seized of the proceedings under Section 263, the assessee raised an alternative claim for the benefit of Section 10A. The Commissioner did not […]
