Derivatives on stocks (new/existing) which meet the enhanced eligibility criteria (given at para 4 above) shall be cash settled until further notification, however such stocks, if they fail to satisfy any of the enhanced eligibility criteria for a continuous period of three months, shall move from cash settlement to physical settlement.
Meat of Sheep or goat or poultry, frozen and packed in LDPE/HDPE bags having varied weight and quantity printed/labelled on such pickings, whether could be held to be packed in unit containers?
In re Esprit India Private Limited (GST AAR Haryana) i. Taxability of services provided by Esprit India to its associate concern in Hong Kong EDCFE under GST regime. The services provided by Esprit India to its associate concern in Hong Kong EDCFE are taxable supplies, as discussed in para 6 above ii. Whether the services […]
In case the customer does not or is not able to redeem the rewards points, within their validity period of 36 months from the date of issue, the reward points are forfeited by the applicant. Whether this amount of issuance fee retained/forfeited by LSRPL, would amount to consideration for actionable claims and subject to GST.
R.S. Infra-Transmission Ltd Vs State of Rajasthan (Rajasthan High Court) The contention of Mr. R.B. Mathur is that Rule 18 will take care of the situation. However, while considering the matter, we have to look into the matter whether the benefit envisaged under the Rajasthan VAT Act especially under sub-Section (1) shall be allowed only […]
Commissioner of State Tax, Gujarat State hereby notifies that no E-Way Bill is required to be generated for intra-city movement as well as intra-state movement of all goods within whole of the territory of the State except for intrastate movement within whole of the territory of the State of following 19 goods of consignment value exceeding fifty thousand rupees:
Seeks to impose definitive anti dumping duty on imports fishnet or fishing nets originating from China or Bangladesh vide Notification No. 20/2018-Customs (ADD)
For the only reason that the payment of purchase has been made after a lapse of 9 months cannot render the purchase as non genuine unless and otherwise any material is brought on record which could negate this
Reasons recorded by AO to reopen assessment merely on basis of information from DIT(Inv.) without independently applying his own mind could not be said to be reason to believe that income had escaped assessment hence, reopening was bad in law.
One these reasonings, in the absence of any material change justifying the Revenue to take a different view of the matter— and, if there was no change, it was in support of the assessee— we do not think the question should have been reopened and contrary to what had been decided by the CIT in the earlier proceedings, a different and contradictory stand should have been taken
