Dive into the detailed analysis of the Shyam Sunder Khandelwal Vs ACIT case by Rajasthan High Court, exploring the applicability of Sections 153C and 148 of the Income Tax Act. Understand the implications and conclusions drawn.
Pinkcity Jewelhouse Pvt. Ltd. Vs PCIT (ITAT Jaipur) ITAT Quashes Section 263 proceeding which were merely based on audit objections and lacked an independent assessment
Directorate of Enforcement cannot sit over the seized assets, and the failure to release them is a violation of Section 132B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, applicable under Section 37(3) of FEMA, 1999. Harish Forex Services Pvt. Limited Vs Assistant Director Of Enforcement (Rajasthan High Court)
ead about the Rajasthan High Court’s decision quashing an income tax notice under Section 148A for being barred by limitation. Case details of Bijendra Singh vs ITO.
Rajasthan High Court grants bail to Mohit Sharma in a case involving 73 fake firms and Rs. 73.54 Crore ITC transaction. Analysis of the legal proceedings and factors considered.
Jaipur Smart City Limited (JSCL) are covered under Governmental Authority as defined in the explanation to clause (16) of Section 2 of the IGST Act, 2017. The appellant are liable to pay GST on recovery of road cutting charges from M/s JSCL @18% (i.e. 9% CGST + 9% SGST.
Rajasthan High Court rules on interest for delayed tax refund in Dwejesh Acharya vs. ITO case under Vivad Se Vishwas Act. Legal insights on tax dispute settlement.
In the Nahar Industrial Enterprises Ltd. vs. Union of India case, Rajasthan High Court ensures GST refund isn’t denied solely due to multiple inputs and outputs.
Read Rajasthan High Court’s judgment in Bhagwati Jewellers regarding release of seized gold bullion and goods by Enforcement Directorate
Read about the ITAT Jaipur decision in Ajay Kumar Jain vs ITO case, allowing 25% reduction in DLC Rate due to land use restrictions. Section 50C addition deleted. Analysis and conclusion included
