It has come to notice of this office that the above entry has been interpreted by Customs as an Extension of Entry No.69 and therefore the entry No.72 with description ” All Processed Cotton made-ups including Quilted Cotton made ups and not covered under Sl.No.69″ are being excluded from the scope and coverage of the entry No.69A. With a view to redress the problem of exporters and remove any ambiguity in this regard it is clarified that the entry No.69A is applicable to “100% Cotton Yarn dyed made-ups” covered under both entry No.69 and 72 of Appendix-28A.
It is directed to inform that a number of writ peritions have been filed in the High court of Chennai and in the Hight court of Kerala (Ernakulam Bench) challenging the power of the Central Government vide Section 8A of CTA’65 to impose duty on imported wheat vide Notification NO. 127/99 Customs dated 1.12.1999. the customs duty on imported wheat was raised from ‘Free’ to 50%
In exercise of powers conferred under paragraph 4.11 of the Export and Import Policy,1997-2002, as notified in the Gazette of India extraordinary, Part-II-Section 3-Sub-section (ii) vide S.O.No.283(E) dated 31.3.97, the Director General of Foreign Trade hereby makes the following amendment in the Handbook of Procedures (Vol.1) (RE-99), 1997-2002.
The new clause 49 shall apply to all the listed private and public sector companies, in accordance with the schedule of implementation. However for listed entities, which are not companies, but body corporates (e.g. private and public sector banks, financial institutions
In exercise of the powers conferred by section37 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944) the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Central Excise Rules, 1944
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 156 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Customs (Settlement of Cases) Rules, 1999, namely:-
DGFT Notification No. 47 (07 March 2000) revises import policies for chemicals like chloroform and methyl chloroform under the Export-Import Policy 1997-2002.
Circular No. 520/16/2000-CX Of late, it has come to the notice of the Board that where an adverse CEGAT order pertains to more than one assessee, the concerned Commissioner sends proposals for C.A. only in respect of one party without checking up as to whether C.A proposals are being made in respect of other parties covered by the order or not. This discrepancy has been seen even in case of parties belonging to the same Commissionerate or the same zone
Whereas the Central Government is satisfied that according to a practice that was generally prevalent regarding levy of duty of Excise (including nonlevy thereof) under section 3 of the Central Excise Act, of 1944(1 of 1944) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), duty of excise on aerated waters prepared and dispensed by vending machines falling under Chapter heading no. 2201.20 or 2202.20 of the Schedule to the Central Excise
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 to 1944), the Central Government having satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 6/2000-Central Excise, dated the 1st March, 2000, namely:- In the said notification.
