S.O. (E) – In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962) and in supersession of the Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No. 58/2000-NT-Customs, [S.O. 889(E)] dated the 26th September, 2000 the Central Government
S.O. (E) – In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of Section 20 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (2 of 1899) and sub-clause (i) of clause (a) of sub-section (3) of Section 14 of Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962) and in supersession of the Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No. 57/2000-NT-Customs, [S.O.888(E)] dated the 26th September, 2000 the Central Government, hereby:-
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Government hereby makes the following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue No. 58/97-Cus. (NT), dated 24th November, 1997, namely:-
In exercise of powers conferred by section 5 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 (No.22 of 1992) read with paragraph 4.11 of the Export and Import Policy,1997-2002 (incorporating amendments made up to 31.3.2000), the Central Government hereby the makes following further amendments in Schedule 2, Table-B of the book titled ITC (HS) Classifications of Export and Imports items, 1997-2002.
Duty paid on furnace oil, procured from domestic oil companies, would be reimbursed to EOU/EPZ/EHTP/STP units by the Development Commissioner of the concerned Zone as per the rate of Drawback notified by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade from time to time.
Circular No. 555/51/2000-CX.I In connection with the Circular No. 540/36/2000-CX dated 8.8.2000 with regard to the interpretation of amended section 11-A of Central Excise Act, 1944 w.e.f. 12.5.2000, the Supreme Court Judgment in the case of Mysore Rolling Mills Private Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Belgium [1987(28) ELT 50(SC)] has come to Board”s notice. The Supreme Court has examined the issue of limitation in that case in an identical situation.
Circular No. 554/50/2000-CX I am directed to state that representations have been received in the Board seeking clarifications as to whether Additional Excise Duty under Textile and Textile Articles Act, 1978 (hereafter referred to as AED (T&TA) is leviable or not on cotton / man made yarns manufactured and cleared into DTA by a 100% EOU using indigenous raw materials.
“Export Oriented Unit” means a Hundred Percent Export Oriented Unit as approved by the Board of Approvals appointed by the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Industry, Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion or the Development Commissioner concerned.
We hereby declare that the above statements are true and correct to the best of my/our knowledge and belief. I/We will abide by any other condition which may be stipulated by the concerned Development Commissioner of Secretariat of Industrial Approvals(Deptt. of Industrial Policy and Promotion). I/We fully understand that any Permission Letter granted to me/us on the basis of the statement furnished is liable to cancellation or any other action that may be taken having regard to the circumstances of the case if it is found that any of the statements or facts therein are incorrect or false.
The depreciation shall be allowed for the period from the date of commencement of commercial production of the unit or where such goods have been received after such commencement, from the date such goods have come into use for commercial production to the date of payment of duty.
