Follow Us:

If directors admitted that installed capacity has not enhanced, then same cannot be contradicted by a report of the CA to claim additional depreciation

September 19, 2011 894 Views 0 comment Print

Anjani Synthetics Ltd Vs Dy CIT (ITAT Ahemdabad)- The assessee’s Counsel did not dispute the Directors’ Report which states that the installed capacity of current and previous year is not ascertainable. It would, therefore, show that the management was aware of the fact that the installed capacity has not been enhanced even if some plant and machinery were purchased.

For Computing deduction u/s. 10A up-linking charges out of telecommunication expenses to be deducted from both export turnover and the total turnover

September 19, 2011 1261 Views 0 comment Print

DCIT Vs M/s Intel Technology India Ltd. (ITAT Bangalore)- Assessing Officer has by referring to clause (iv) of Explanation 2 to section 10A of the Act, reduced telecommunication expenses/ lease lines charges from the export turnover but did not reduced such charges from the total turnover.

For claiming deduction U/s. 80IA(4), twin conditions that is investment in eligible project and execution of the project by itself, are required to be satisfied

September 19, 2011 2579 Views 0 comment Print

The Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)- Composite water supply which includes manufacturing, supplying, laying, joining of pipeline and includes construction of pump house, delivery, commissioning of turbine pump sets, installation of booster mains, branch mains and elevator reservoirs cannot be termed as development of infrastructure facility as defined in explanation (c) to Section 80IA(4).

Retraction of statement made during the survey after six months merely an afterthought – ITAT Mumbai

September 19, 2011 1134 Views 0 comment Print

Synthetic Colour Chem Industries Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)- The survey was conducted on 18.2.2005 when the loose papers being the pages 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 were found which had been duly signed by the partner of the assessee firm based on entries and based on the said papers the partner of the assessee had declared undisclosed income of Rs.1.05 crores.

The word ‘may’ used in the sub-sec. (2) to sec. 50C do not give discretion to the A.O. to refer or not to refer the matter to the DVO

September 19, 2011 1174 Views 0 comment Print

Mrs. Asha Bharat Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)- The Ld. Counsel submitted that the DVO has determined the fair market value of the property as on 1.4.1981 at 29.62 lakhs as against the value declared by the assessee at 43.10 lakhs.

Non-compete Fees Paid pursuance to non-compete agreement not allowable as revenue expensiture – ITAT Delhi

September 19, 2011 1870 Views 0 comment Print

Saraf Chemicals Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)- If the expenditure is made for the initial outlay or for the expansion of the business or a substantial replacement of the equipment, then it would fall under the capital expenditure.

VAT Cir – 14T of 2011 – Waiver in respect of penalty and interest imposed on the sales made by Handmade Soap manufacturers for the period of 1st April 2005 to 31st March 2010

September 19, 2011 1649 Views 0 comment Print

The State Government has issued a Government Resolution referred above by which the waiver has been provided in respect of interest and penalty levied on the turnover of sales of soap except detergent not exceeding Rs.20 lacs made by handmade soap manufacturing units certified by KVIC or KVIB or the case may be for the period of 1st April 2005 to 31st March 2010.

Tribunal can issue direction beyond the scope of the appeal for correction of error – Delhi HC

September 18, 2011 1230 Views 0 comment Print

Insilco Limited Vs CIT (Delhi High Court)- Honourable Tribunal has rightly given the aforesaid directions, which are nothing but pointing out what the AO was required to do under the law.

Government decides not to proceed for the time being with further public offer of 5% paid-up equity shares of ONGC through an offer for Sale

September 18, 2011 819 Views 0 comment Print

The Government has decided not to proceed for the time being with further public offer of 5% paid-up equity shares of Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC ) through an offer for sale. However, the Government continues to believe in the inherent strength of ONGC . The decision will be evaluated in due course keeping in view all relevant factors. Significant work has been done by all involved with a common objective of delivering a successful Offer and all continue to believe in the inherent strength of the Company. The Government remains committed to the Disinvestment programme.

India Convenes meeting of BRICS Finance Ministers in Washington DC on September 22, 2011

September 18, 2011 675 Views 0 comment Print

The Union Finance Minister Shri Pranab Mukherjee said that India is convening a meeting of BRICS Finance Ministers in Washington DC on September 22, 2011 on the sidelines of the Fund-Bank and G-20 Meetings. The Finance Minister said that we would explore the manner in which BRICS could coordinate in addressing the evolving economic and financial situation in the various countries of the world.

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031