a) Log in with your user ID, password and PAN b) Click on the option ‘Provide email ID / mobile number to receive updates as per the policy of ITD c) Go to ‘Update Existing Details’ and provide your desired email ID in the mail d) ID’ Field and/or in mobile number field, provide your correct 10 digit mobile number e) Click on Update. A message will be displayed as ‘Your details changed successfully’.
Tax paid by me is reflecting in wrong assessment year (A.Y.). I have paid Securities Transaction Tax, Banking Cash Transaction Tax, but it is not reflecting in my Form 26AS.What if the Challan Identification Number (CIN) of the advance/self assessment tax paid in the bank (as given in Part C of Form 26AS) does not match with the CIN in the challan counterfoil available with me?
Date of payment displayed in Form 26AS is different than date mentioned in TDS certificate issued by my deductor/collector. How can I correct it? I have given incorrect PAN to my deductor. What will be the effect in Form 26AS? How can any deductor verify the status of the TDS/TCS returns furnished by him?
Revenue contending that sale took place on 24.02.05 and thereby the investment made u/s. 54EC on 30.08.2005 is beyond the prescribed period of six month. Once the board of directors approve the transfer, then only the process of transfer of shares can be said to be completed in case of a private limited company. The Annual Return filed before the ROC disclosed that the date of registration of transfer was 28th February 2005, confirmed by purchaser. Board resolution approving transfer of shares was passed on 25th February 2005.
CIT vs. DSL DSoftware Ltd (Karnataka High Court) (i) Income Tax department made liable to pay Cost of Rs.1 lac for making the assessee to contest the appeals in three forums and wasting court’s time and tax payers’ money. (ii) Deduction u/s 10B available for the extended period upto 10 years.
It is sine qua non for application of Section 50 C that the transfer must be of a capital asset, being land or building or both, but then a leasehold right in such a capital asset cannot be equated with the capital asset per se. We are, therefore, unable to see any merits in revenue’s contention that even when a leasehold right in land or building or both is transferred, the provisions of Section 50C can be invoked.
As per the provisions of rules 51 & 54A of Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961 read with sub-rules (1) & (2) of rule 27 of Conduct of Election Rules, 1961, covers containing postal ballot papers received by the Returning Officers upto the time fixed for commencement of counting shall be taken into account for counting. There is no prohibition in Law that the votes on postal ballots cannot be recorded or received after the date and time fixed for taking poll at polling stations.
On review of the details furnished by the insurers under the aforesaid circulars, certain discrepancies were observed by the Authority. It was also observed that while some of the insurers have robust IT backed systems/processes in place to ensure compliance with the stipulations as regards limits on various expense heads, in case of others there was a felt need for building up such platforms and ensure that they function at the desired levels of effectiveness and efficiency.
It has come to the notice of SEBI that some entities are soliciting the general public to entrust their funds and securities to them and offering portfolio management and advisory services without obtaining certificate of registration from SEBI to act as a portfolio manager.
In the instant case, indisputably the society is running a school since 2003 and has been continuously allowed exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiad) of the Act. Ignoring these aspects, the ld. CIT in the impugned order rejected the request for registration while observing that the society did not place before him or the Addl. CIT, original instrument of its establishment and that it was controlled by family members of Shri Rajinder Singh while cash payments had been made without deduction of TDS.
