Garg Zevar Palace Pvt. Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Section 147 mandates that the case can only be reopened after expiry of four years only if there was a failure on the part of the assessee to fully and truly disclose all material facts necessary. The assessee has disclosed the fact of receipt of Rs.60,00,000/- […]
Navajbai Ratan Tata Trust Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Mumbai ITAT UNIQUE ORDER on one tata trust case where assessee opted out of benefit of sec 12AA to apparently save itself from onerous tax exposure with sec 12AA on its head so in these circumstances it is held that 42. The question then arises as to […]
BYK Asia Pacific Pte. Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune) On going through the documents/material as discussed above, it is evident that Seminar expenses, Training expenses, Printing expenses and Staff welfare expenses are amounts paid by the Indian BO to the Singapore HO, which satisfy the twin conditions of `reimbursement’ as discussed supra, viz., one-to-one direct […]
Balbir Investment Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) A perusal of the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer shows that he has reopened the assessment by recording the reasons that shares of G.J. Holdings has been procured by Blabir Investments Pvt. The relevant observations of the Assessing Officer in the reasons recorded by the Assessing […]
Space Chem Engineers Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) A perusal of the reasons recorded shows that the name of the companies from whom the assessee company is alleged to have accepted share capital / share application money are different from the companies mentioned in the assessment order from whom the assessee company has actually taken the […]
ITO Vs Angel Cement Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Delhi) Now coming to the issue of fresh addition made by the ld. CIT (A) by making enhancement on account of alleged commission income in three cases. Though as discussed above, the ld. CIT (A) has deleted the addition made u/s.68 on the ground that no unaccounted funds […]
Ingenico International India Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (Delhi High Court) A plain reading of Section 241A shows that the mere issuance of the scrutiny notice under Section 143 (2) of the Act cannot stall the remittance of refund to the assessee. The refund can only be stalled if the conditions stipulated in Section 241A of […]
Sajan Kumar Jain Vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Issue of Scrutiny Notice U/S 143(2) After Issue of Notice U/S 142(1) Invalid Where Valid Return U/S 139 already Filed on Record ITAT held that we are inclined to quash the assessment order dated 29.12.2017 framed u/s 143(3) of the Act for want of jurisdiction as notice issued […]
Tek Chand Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) The A.O. obtained the approval of the PR. CIT before issuing the notice under section 148 of the Act. The proposal dt. 11/03/2016 seeking the approval for issuance of notice under section 148 of the Act, by the A.O. is placed at page no. 2 & 3 of the […]
Purshottambhai Bachubhai Pitroda Vs DCIT (Gujarat high court) Thus, on receipt of the reasons, the noticee is entitled to file his objections and the Assessing Officer, in turn, is obliged to dispose of the objections by passing a speaking order. Though the Assessing Officer had an opportunity at the stage of dealing with the objections […]
