Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mohit Batola Vs ACIT (ITAT Dehradun)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mohit Batola Vs ACIT (ITAT Dehradun) ITAT Dehradun Quashes 271(1)(c) Levy for Non-Specific Charge – Penalty Invalid Where AO Fails to Strike Off Irrelevant Limb- Vague 274 Notice Equals Non-Application of Mind A search was conducted u/s 132 on the assessee, engaged in land development and real estate business, along with the Surya Builders group. Assessment was completed u/s 153A r.w.s.144 determining income at ₹1.88 crore against returned income of ₹12.72 lakh, followed by penalty of ₹8.46 lakh u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. Assessee contended that...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930