Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Bansal Steels Power Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Bansal Steels Power Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) No Change in Shareholding – ITAT Delhi Allows Carry Forward of Losses to Bansal Steels Power Ltd ITAT Delhi dismissed the Revenue’s appeal & partly allowed Assessee’s cross-objection, upholding CIT(A)’s decision allowing carry forward of business losses to subsequent years. AO had denied the benefit u/s 79, alleging that a change in shareholding pursuant to an NCLT order under the IBC Code triggered restrictions on loss carry forward without approval from PCIT.  CIT(A), however, found that no change in shareholding had occurred during ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Patna ITAT: Interest on Delayed Payment of Sales Tax, Service Tax & Employer’s PF Contribution Allowable; TDS Interest Not Deductible Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031