Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mahesh Ratilal Ganatra Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mahesh Ratilal Ganatra Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) UK Not OK for Notice! – ITAT Delhi Deletes Penalty as 142(1) Never Reached the NRI in Britain; Penalty Quashed as Notice Not Served – ITAT Delhi Holds Service, Not Mere Issuance, is Mandatory for 142(1) Compliance Assessee, a Non-Resident Indian residing in the UK, did not file any return of income for AY 2018-19 since he had no income accruing or arising in India. AO levied a penalty of ₹10,000 u/s 272A(1)(d) for alleged non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) dated 06.01.2023. Assessee contended that no such notice was ever served upon him &...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Specific Charge, No Penalty: Mumbai ITAT Cancels Section 270A Levy for Defective Notice Mere Investigation Wing Alert Is Not ‘Reason to Believe’: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Reopening Liquor Trader Gets Relief as ITAT Reduces GP Rate to 3.13% & Deletes Separate Expense Disallowance From Clean Chit to Crores in Penalty: SEBI Reopens Suzlon Case and Strikes Hard ITAT Restores Section 69 Matter to AO After Ex Parte Assessment and Appeal Orders View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930