Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Indiabulls Securities Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2023-24
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Indiabulls Securities Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Margin Deficiency Fee Allowed as Deduction -Explanation to Section 37(1) Not Attracted; ITAT Rules Margin Shortfall Payments Are Business Deductions; Regulatory Margin Fees Not Penal: ITAT Allows Deduction Under Section 37(1) Delhi Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that charges levied by the Stock Exchange for margin shortfall are not penal in nature & hence allowable as business expenditure u/s 37(1). Assessee had claimed ₹1.22 crore paid to the Stock Exchange for shortfall in margin money. CPC, Bengaluru, disallowed it while process...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Patna ITAT: Interest on Delayed Payment of Sales Tax, Service Tax & Employer’s PF Contribution Allowable; TDS Interest Not Deductible Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031