Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vadivel Chandran Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vadivel Chandran Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT Bangalore condones delay – NFAC’s notices invalid as sent to email not mentioned in Form 35; Tax Appeal Restored: Incorrect Email Use Vitiates NFAC’s Ex Parte Proceedings; Natural Justice Violated: Ex Parte Addition Quashed Due to Service on Incorrect Email Assessee, an employee of Cognizant Technology Solutions, purchased a flat in Chennai for ₹71.71 lakh, claiming that funds came from a ₹95 lakh housing loan from ICICI Bank & cash of ₹32.50 lakh received from his parents. AO disbelieved the explanation, noting lack of proof fo...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Tenancy Rights Transfer Taxable Only on Possession: STCG Addition Deleted JDA May Trigger Transfer- But No Double Taxation Allowed: Karnataka HC Relief CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO No Penalty When Quantum Deleted: 270A Cannot Survive Without Addition Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930