Case Law Details
Case Name : Apollo Tyres Ltd Vs ACIT (Kerala High Court)
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Courts :
All High Courts Kerala High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Apollo Tyres Ltd Vs ACIT (Kerala High Court)
Reopening of assessment beyond four years was unsustainable as non-filing of Form 3CL did not constitute non-disclosure of material facts.
Conclusion: Form 3CL was not a determinative document for claiming deduction, and non-production of the same did not amount to wilful non-disclosure or suppression of material facts under Explanation 1 to Section 147. The reopening of assessment beyond four years was therefore invalid and time barred.
Held: Assessee claimed a deduction under Section 35(2AB) for the assessment year 2009-10. In the approval grante...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

