Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Wazeera Saleh Mithiborwala Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Wazeera Saleh Mithiborwala Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Assessee filed return declaring ₹1.24 Cr income. Based on Investigation Wing information alleging bogus long-term capital gains from penny stocks,  AO reopened the case u/s 148.   Assessee filed return in response, but did not furnish further details or comply with summons.   AO completed assessment u/s 144 r.w.s. 147 &  added ₹5.45 Cr u/s 68, denying exemption u/s 10(38). CIT(A) upheld the assessment. Before the ITAT,  Assessee raised a legal ground that no notice u/s 143(2) was issued after filing the return in response to 148. ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930