This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No Independent Verification, No Addition: ITAT Upholds Relief in Penny Stock Case
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ITO Vs Prithvi Raj Kandoi (HUF) (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2012-13
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
ITO Vs Prithvi Raj Kandoi (HUF) (ITAT Delhi)
AO reopened the assessment u/s 148 based on information from Investigation Wing & treated Rs.8,05,127/- (investment in Global Capital Markets Ltd.) as bogus u/s 68, further adding Rs.24,153/- u/s 69C as commission expenditure (3% of trade value). AO concluded that transactions were only accommodation entries for routing unaccounted money. CIT(A) deleted both additions.
Before Tribunal, Dept argued that these were sham penny stock transactions & CIT(A) erred in granting relief. Assessee countered that purchases were through recognized stock e...







Sir,
thanks for sharing case law