Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Fariyad Alam Vs Union of India (Patna High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Fariyad Alam Vs Union of India (Patna High Court) Patna High Court held that seizure memo without recording mandatory ‘reason to believe’ as required under Section 110 of the Customs Act, 1962 is invalid and bad-in-law. Accordingly, order of confiscation is liable to be quashed. Facts- The petitioner in this case is challenging the Seizure Memo dated 21.04.2023 whereby and whereunder 35 bags of wheat containing 55 Kgs each have been seized by one Sunil Dutt Gaurola, Assistant Sub-Inspector, 47 Battalion, Shashtra Seema Bal, Bihar and handed over to the Assistant Commandant ‘A’ COY, 47t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930