Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Gaze Fashion Trade Limited Vs ACIT (Rajasthan High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Gaze Fashion Trade Limited Vs ACIT (Rajasthan High Court) Wrong Officer, Wrong Notice – Rajasthan HC Quashes Sec.148 Reassessment by JAO Instead of FAO In a significant ruling, the Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur struck down a reassessment notice issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of the Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO). The Division Bench held that once the faceless assessment regime has been brought into force, any notice u/s 148 must emanate from the FAO & not from the traditional JAO. Petitioner challenged the notice dated 15.03.2024 on the ground that it wa...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031