Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Paras Ram Vs PCIT (Rajasthan High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Paras Ram Vs PCIT (Rajasthan High Court) Rajasthan HC Quashes Sec.148 Notice Issued by Jurisdictional AO Instead of FAO Division Bench of Rajasthan High Court disposed of the writ petition by following its earlier decision in Gaze Fashion Trade Ltd. vs. ACIT (order dated 12.08.2025). Petitioner challenged the reassessment notice u/s 148 on the ground that it was issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of the Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO). The Bench noted that this very issue had already been considered in earlier rulings such as: Hexaware Technologies Ltd. vs. ACIT, Sha...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930