Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Rudra Buildwell Homes Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Rudra Buildwell Homes Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) No Proper Sanction No Reopening- Double Addition Not Permissible as Funds Already Taxed in Lender’s Hands – ITAT Delhi Quashes Reopening & Deletes 20.25 Cr Addition The primary issue was validity of reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 147 r.w.s. 148 based on notice issued u/s 148A(d) dated 23.05.2022. Assessee challenged reopening on the ground that since more than three years had elapsed from end of AY 2016-17, mandatory approval u/s 151(ii) from Principal Chief Commissioner or equivalent authority was required, but Revenue had o...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai Section 28 Land Acquisition Interest Exempt as Enhanced Compensation: ITAT Delhi Bogus Purchase Addition Cannot Be Based on Suspicion Alone: ITAT Chennai Section 69 Addition Deleted as No Evidence Linked Joint Holder to Alleged On-Money: ITAT Mumbai WhatsApp Chats Accepted as Evidence, On-Money Addition Limited to 25%: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031