Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Satyadevi Alamuri Vs Office of Assistant Commissioner of GST and Central Excise (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Satyadevi Alamuri Vs Office of Assistant Commissioner of GST and Central Excise (Madras High Court)

The Madras High Court (Madurai Bench) quashed a tax demand order raised against a company under liquidation, holding that deposits made into the Electronic Cash Ledger under Section 49 of the CGST Act must be treated as valid tax payments—even in the absence of GSTR-3B return filing—when such filing is rendered impossible due to liquidation proceedings and GS

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Nipun Arora is a Chartered Accountant in practice having more than 9 years of experience in Indirect Taxation advisory, litigation and GST implementation process. He has advised various domestic and multinational clients on crucial aspects of Indirect taxes and has assisted in strategic executio View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SEZ unit can claim ITC refund on Input services for Authorised operations: Bombay HC Oversight of concessional rate is an error rectifiable u/s 161 of CGST Act: Uttarakhand HC GST Demand order liable to be quashed if Demand exceeds amount specified in SCN: Chhattisgarh HC GST Appellate Authority Cannot Claim “Functus Officio” If Appeal Dismissed for Pre-Deposit, Not Merits: Jharkhand HC Calcutta High Court Dismisses GST Writ for Appeal Delay, Imposes ₹50,000 Costs View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728