This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No Section 271(1)(c) penalty if debatable issue is involved: ITAT Pune
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- DCIT Vs Vinod Ramchandra Jadhav (ITAT Pune)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2010-11
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
DCIT Vs Vinod Ramchandra Jadhav (ITAT Pune)
1. Facts of the Case
Vinod Ramchandra Jadhav, an individual assessee, filed his return of income for A.Y. 2010-11 under section 139(1) declaring an income of ₹77,29,880. Pursuant to a search conducted on 31.10.2010 under section 132 in the Sava Group, he was also covered and subsequently filed returns under section 153A for A.Y. 2007-08 to 2012-13. He also approached the Income Tax Settlement Commission (ITSC) under section 245C(1) offering additional income for settlement across these years.
However, the ITSC, while considering hi...





