Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Gopal Agarwal Vs ITO (ITAT Agra)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Gopal Agarwal Vs ITO (ITAT Agra) ITAT Agra held that confirming penalty under section 271B of the Income Tax Act before finalization of quantum assessment is unjust and unfair. Accordingly, matter restored back to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. Facts- The case of the assessee was selected by Revenue for framing scrutiny assessment under CASS. There was a cash deposit to the tune of Rs.5,21,89,264/- in the bank accounts of the assessee with the ICICI Bank. The assessee submitted during the course of assessment proceedings that the assessee is engaged in commission business of cash handling. AO ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930