Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vijay Maneklal Bhansali Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vijay Maneklal Bhansali Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Sections 147/148 remain applicable if AO opts not to invoke Section 153C:   ITAT Mumbai upholds addition under Section 68 of ₹4.89 Cr. The case of Vijay Maneklal Bhansali vs. ITO revolves around the reassessment under Sections 147/148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the addition of ₹4.89 crore under Section 68. The appellant, Vijay Maneklal Bhansali, challenged the reassessment order citing procedural and jurisdictional lapses by the Assessing Officer (AO). The ITAT Mumbai addressed the legal and factual aspects of the case, affirming the AO...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930