Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rahul Dinesh Bajpai Vs Dy. Director of Income Tax (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2023-24
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Rahul Dinesh Bajpai Vs Dy. Director of Income Tax (ITAT Mumbai) If the property is jointly owned by husband and wife and the entire TDS is deposited in the name of husband, the entire TDS credit should be allowed to the husband, provided the wife does not claim any part of TDS. Facts of the case: The assessee sold an immovable property jointly owned by him and his wife. The capital gain from sale was offered in equal proportions by both the assessee and his wife. However, since the TDS was deposited solely in the name of the assessee, the entire TDS was claimed by the assessee alone. The Centr...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio


My Published Posts

No section 68 addition merely for trading in penny stock: ITAT Mumbai Section 271D & 271E Penalty cannot be levied if assessment is quashed No section 68 addition in the hands of conduit entity View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930