Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Massood Gulam Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Massood Gulam Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court) Conclusion: Reassessment notice issued to assessee by AO was quashed due to non-compliance with the statutory requirement of providing a minimum of seven days for the taxpayer to furnish a reply under Section 148A(b). Held: In the instant case, the issue arose for consideration was notice dated 21.03.2023 issued under Section 148A(b) for the Assessment Year 2019-20 calling upon assessee to submit his response / reply within a period of six days which was contrary to the prescribed period of seven days as contemplated under Section 148A(b). Therefore...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031