Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Chandiwala Enterprises Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 219/Mum/2024
Date of Judgement/Order : 25/07/2024
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

ACIT Vs Chandiwala Enterprises Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)

ITAT Mumbai held that provisions of section 56(2)(x) of the Income Tax Act doesn’t apply to developer who has taken over the possession of lawn or building or both for the purpose of the development.

Facts-

The assessee is engaged in construction work. Return of income was filed on 14/12/2020, declaring Nil income showing current year loss of Rs.6,37,018/-. The return was selected for CASS and accordingly statutory notices were issued and served upon the assessee.

The AO was in possession of the information that the assessee has purchased two immovable properties at Ambivali village and Wshiwara village in Andheri, Mumbai for the purchases value of Rs.13,81,87,000/- and Rs.32,950/- whereas the stamp duty value of the properties are Rs.80,35,63,000/- and Rs.5,81,96,200/- respectively. The AO sought to add the difference in the stamp duty value and actual purchase value as income from other sources in the hands of the assessee u/s 56(2)(x) of the Act.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031