This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Unjust enrichment not applies to deposit under protest; CESTAT allows 6% interest on deposit
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Bagadiya Brothers Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Hyderabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Hyderabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Bagadiya Brothers Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Hyderabad)
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad, addressed pivotal issues in cross-appeals between Bagadiya Brothers Pvt Ltd (the appellant) and the Commissioner of Customs. The appeals focused on the refundability of deposits made during investigations and the application of unjust enrichment principles.
Background and Proceedings:
Bagadiya Brothers Pvt Ltd, engaged in exporting iron ore fines subject to varying export duties based on iron content, encountered scrutiny over declared Fe (iron) co...
Author Info
