In Re India Optel Limited (GST AAR Uttarakhand)
GST is applicable on Liquidated Damages recovered from vendors: AAR Uttarakhand
In the case “In Re India Optel Limited (GST AAR Uttarakhand),” the issue at hand was the applicability of GST on liquidated damages (LD) recovered by M/s India Optel Limited from their vendors. The ruling was sought under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017, and the Uttarakhand State Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017.
M/s India Optel Limited, a registered entity with GSTIN 05AAGCI2642P5Z7, engaged in manufacturing and entered into contracts with various vendors for the supply of goods and services. These contracts included a clause for liquidated damages in case of delayed delivery or breach of contract by the vendors. Specifically, the clause stipulated a penalty of 0.5% of the contract price for each week of delay, capped at 10% of the contract value.
Applicant’s Position
The applicant sought clarity on whether GST applies to the liquidated damages recovered from vendors. They referenced Board Circular 178/10/2022-GST dated 03.08.2022, which provided two contrasting viewpoints on the issue:
- Non-taxable Viewpoint: Liquidated damages are seen as a means to ensure performance and deter non-performance. They are not considered consideration for supply and therefore are not taxable under GST.
- Taxable Viewpoint: If there is an agreement, express or implied, for liquidated damages, the amount recovered constitutes consideration for a supply and is taxable.
Discussion and Findings
Want to Read the Complete Judgment?
You have read the free case summary. Unlock the full judgment, the detailed judicial reasoning and the downloadable PDF, along with every other premium judgment on TaxGuru.
Already subscribed? Log in
One subscription covers the entire premium judgment library, not just this case.






