Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Indian Potash Limited Vs Deputy Commissioner (ST) (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P.Nos.12101, 12103 & 12105 of 2024
Date of Judgement/Order : 03/06/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Indian Potash Limited Vs Deputy Commissioner (ST) (Madras High Court)

In the case of Indian Potash Limited v. Deputy Commissioner (ST), the Madras High Court addressed three writ petitions seeking direction for the acceptance of appeals filed by the petitioner concerning rejection orders for refund of Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) on ocean freight. The key issue in contention was the procedural requirement under Rule 108(3) of the GST Rules, which mandates filing a hard copy of the impugned order within seven days of presenting the appeal.

The petitioner had filed all three appeals on 18th June 2021, but failed to submit the physical copies of the impugned orders until 2nd February 2024, well beyond the stipulated timeframe. The central argument put forth by the petitioner’s counsel relied on a precedent set by the Madras High Court in M/s. PKV Agencies v. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (GST) (Appeals), Vellore (referred to as PKV Agencies), where it was established that the failure to produce the hard copy of the impugned order is a technical defect and should not hinder the processing of the appeal if filed within the statutory time limit.

Furthermore, counsel highlighted that the issue of refund of IGST on ocean freight had been extensively addressed and decided by various High Courts, including the Madras High Court itself. Therefore, delaying the processing of the appeals solely due to the non-submission of physical copies of orders would unjustly prejudice the petitioner.

Ms. K. Vasanthamala, the learned Government Advocate representing the respondents, acknowledged the non-compliance with the filing requirement and the consequent non-processing of the appeals. However, she did not dispute the applicability of the PKV Agencies ruling, where the Orissa High Court’s decision in M/s. Atlas PVC Pipes Ltd. v. State of Odisha was followed to emphasize the procedural nature of the requirement.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031