Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : B.K. Rajanna Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

B.K. Rajanna Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)

In B.K. Rajanna vs. ITO, the Bangalore ITAT addressed a dispute over cash deposits made during the demonetization period. The taxpayer, a bar and restaurant owner, deposited ₹44.83 lakh in cash, including ₹24.44 lakh in Specified Bank Notes (SBNs). The Assessing Officer (AO) held that the taxpayer was not authorized to accept SBNs after November 8, 2016, and added ₹9.50 lakh as unexplained cash under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act, subjecting it to a higher tax rate under Section 115BBE. The CIT(A) upheld this assessment, reject

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31