Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Udayraj Yadav Proprietor-Zenith Creative Services Vs Sales Tax Officer Class II AVATO Ward 96 Zone 09 Delhi & Anr. (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P.(C)-7436/2024
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/05/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Udayraj Yadav Proprietor-Zenith Creative Services Vs Sales Tax Officer Class II AVATO Ward 96 Zone 09 Delhi & Anr. (Delhi High Court)

In a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court has quashed a GST demand of ₹12,92,704 against Udayraj Yadav, proprietor of Zenith Creative Services, due to improper communication of the Show Cause Notice (SCN) via the GST portal. The case, Udayraj Yadav vs Sales Tax Officer Class II AVATO Ward 96 Zone 09 Delhi & Anr., highlights the critical importance of clear communication in tax proceedings.

Background of the Case

The petitioner, Udayraj Yadav, was unaware of the initiation of proceedings against him due to the SCN being uploaded under the “Additional Notices” category on the GST portal. The SCN, dated September 23, 2023, proposed a demand of ₹12,92,704. The petitioner argued that he did not receive any other form of communication, and as a result, he could not respond to the notice.

Court’s Observations

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031