Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Union Territory of J&K & Ors (Jammu & Kashmir High Court)
Appeal Number : WP (C) No. 3949/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 29/04/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Union Territory of J&K & Ors (Jammu & Kashmir High Court)

Introduction: In a landmark ruling, the Hon’ble High Court of Jammu & Kashmir addressed the maintainability of writ petitions in the context of vacant appellate authority positions. In the case of Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Union Territory of J&K [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3949 of 2019 dated April 29, 2024], the Court dismissed the petition as infructuous but clarified significant points regarding the jurisdiction and procedural propriety when such positions are vacant. This article delves into the details of the case, the Court’s reasoning, and the broader implications for similar future cases.

At the time of filing the Petition, the post of Dy. Commissioner, State Taxes (Appeals-I) Srinagar (“the Position”) was vacant. The Position was later filled up by the Government Order No. 1027-JK (GAD) of 2020 dated November 02, 2020, by posting Dr. Zahoor Ahmad Raina, KAS. Later, he was transferred vide Government Order No. 651-JK(GAD) of 2021 dated July 24, 2021, and Ms. Sammer Naik, JKAS the Dy. Commissioner, State Taxes (Appeals-II) Srinagar was given the additional charge of the Position. Thereafter, vide Government Order No. 130 (JK) GAD of 2022 dated February 06, 2022, Ms. Tabasum Shafat Kamli, JKAS filled the Position.

Since the Position had already been filled up, the Court held that the appeal filed by the Petitioner must be considered and decided by the Appellate Authority i.e., Dy. Commissioner, State Taxes (Appeals-I) Srinagar.

Conclusion: The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Union Territory of J&K ruling provides clarity on the maintainability of writ petitions in cases of administrative vacancies. While the petition was dismissed as infructuous due to the subsequent filling of the position, the Court’s directives ensure that the appeal process remains unhindered. This judgment sets a precedent for handling similar cases, emphasizing the judiciary’s role in overseeing administrative efficacy and ensuring that justice is not delayed due to procedural vacancies. The swift resolution of such vacancies is crucial for maintaining the integrity of administrative and judicial processes.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031