Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jewel Utensils Industries Vs C.C. Mundra (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Customs Appeal No. 10328 of 2022- DB
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/05/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Jewel Utensils Industries Vs C.C. – Mundra (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

In a significant ruling, the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) Ahmedabad issued a verdict on the case of Jewel Utensils Industries vs. Commissioner of Customs, Mundra. The central issue was the imposition of Anti-Dumping Duty (ADD) on imported stainless steel products under the Advance Authorization Scheme. The tribunal’s decision has major implications for manufacturers and exporters using the Advance Authorization Scheme.

Detailed Analysis

Background

Jewel Utensils Industries, a manufacturer and exporter of stainless steel utensils, imported Cold-rolled Flat products of stainless steel. These imports were made under the Advance Authorization Scheme, which exempts duties on imports meant for export production. The imported goods, originating from China, typically attract Anti-Dumping Duty as per Notification No. 61/2015-Cus (ADD). The dispute arose when the customs authorities contended that Jewel Utensils did not pay the ADD, thus violating the Customs Act.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031