Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Chirag Tejprakash Dangi Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 3256/Mum/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/02/2024
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Chirag Tejprakash Dangi Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

Introduction: In the case of Chirag Tejprakash Dangi Vs ITO, ITAT Mumbai, the tribunal examined the treatment of cash credits and long-term capital gains related to the sale of shares. The dispute arose when the Assessing Officer (AO) treated the sale proceeds of shares as cash credits under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and disallowed the exemption claimed under section 10(38) of the Act. The AO also estimated commission expenses incurred on procuring alleged bogus long-term capital gains and assessed them under section 69C of the Act.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Background of the Case: The assessee, Chirag Tejprakash Dangi, sold shares of Radford Global Ltd. (earlier known as PS Global Ltd.), Surbhi Chemicals & Investment Ltd., and Pyramid Trading & Finance Ltd. (now known as Mishka Finance & Trading Ltd.). These transactions were claimed as exempt under section 10(38) of the Income Tax Act.

2. AO’s Findings: The AO, relying on a report from the Investigation Wing in Kolkata, concluded that the shares were penny stocks, and their sale proceeds were cash credits. Additionally, the AO estimated commission expenses associated with alleged bogus long-term capital gains.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031