Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mani Sundaram Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mani Sundaram Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) No section 271D penalty on cash loan from close relatives due to reasonable cause which subsequently treated as gifts The case of Mani Sundaram Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) revolves around the imposition of penalty under section 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for availing cash loans from close relatives. The appellant, Mani Sundaram, proprietor of M/s. Surabi PVC Pipes, received loans from family members, which were subsequently treated as gifts.  The Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings under section 271D of the Act due to the receipt of cash loans ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930