Case Law Details
Simla Holdings Vs Assistant Commissioner Central Tax Division Rohini (Delhi High Court)
Introduction: The case of Simla Holdings Vs Assistant Commissioner Central Tax Division Rohini before the Delhi High Court revolves around the petitioner’s inability to file an appeal against a GST order due to non-communication of the order. Despite facing proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act of 2002, the petitioner asserts that the order was not uploaded on the common portal, hindering its access to legal recourse.
Detailed Analysis: The petitioner contends that the order, dated 16.06.2023, affirming the demand against them, was not communicated as per standard procedure via upload on the common portal. With their office premises sealed due to ongoing proceedings, even physical copies of the order were inaccessible. While a copy was obtained from the respondent’s office, it was deemed insufficient for filing an appeal.
The court, while acknowledging the petitioner’s predicament, directed the respondents to upload the order on the common portal. This directive aimed to facilitate the petitioner’s access to legal recourse by treating the date of upload as the commencement of the limitation period for filing an appeal. Notably, the court refrained from adjudicating on the merits of the case, preserving the parties’ rights and contentions.
Conclusion: The Delhi High Court’s directive in the Simla Holdings case underscores the importance of procedural fairness and accessibility to legal remedies. By ordering the upload of the GST order on the common portal, the court ensures that the petitioner’s right to appeal is safeguarded despite challenges in communication. This decision highlights the judiciary’s commitment to upholding due process and enabling equitable access to justice in matters concerning tax disputes.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
