Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Goods and Services Tax

Imposition of penalty u/s. 129(3) of UPGST untenable in absence of intention to evade tax

Case Law Details

Case Name
Vacmet India Ltd. Vs Additional Commissioner Grade -2 (Allahabad High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement Vacmet India Ltd. Vs Additional Commissioner Grade -2 (Allahabad High Court) Allahabad High Court held that imposition of penalty under section 129(3) of the UPGST untenable as no observation has been made with regard to intent to evade payment of tax. Facts- The petitioner deals in production of polyester films, BOPP films, specialty coated films and metallized paper, etc. in India. On 14.05.2018, while the goods were transported from manufacturing unit of the petitioner at Agra to its unit at Kosi Kalan, Mathura, the vehicle was intercepted and detention order in Form GST MO...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *