Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Excise Duty

Duty demand alleging sealed/uninstalled packing machine available in factory unsustainable

Case Law Details

Case Name
Godfrey Philips India Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement
Godfrey Philips India Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai) CESTAT Mumbai held that duty liability in terms of Chewing tobacco & Unmanufactured Tobacco Packing Machines (Capacity Determination and Collection of Duty) Rules, 2010 unsustainable merely alleging that sealed/uninstalled packing machine is available in the factory premises. Facts- The major issued involved in the present case is that whether the packing machine which has been sealed/uninstalled by the jurisdictional superintendent, but not removed from the factory, is to be treated as operating packing machine i...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *