This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Duty demand alleging sealed/uninstalled packing machine available in factory unsustainable
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Godfrey Philips India Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Godfrey Philips India Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
CESTAT Mumbai held that duty liability in terms of Chewing tobacco & Unmanufactured Tobacco Packing Machines (Capacity Determination and Collection of Duty) Rules, 2010 unsustainable merely alleging that sealed/uninstalled packing machine is available in the factory premises.
Facts- The major issued involved in the present case is that whether the packing machine which has been sealed/uninstalled by the jurisdictional superintendent, but not removed from the factory, is to be treated as operating packing machine i...






